Skip to main content
Summary:Sadly, the recent crackdowns against the pro-democracy forces in Burma/Myanmar reveal just how limited international shaming can be as a tactic for protecting human rights.
Burma/Myanmar
is presently in a state of crisis. Just this last week, more than
100, 000 demonstrators, including scores of Buddhist monks, took to
the streets. True to form, the government has responded by
employing lethal force to put down the pro-democracy movement. Also
true to form, its actions have been met by shock and outrage, as
governments and citizens groups around the world have called for an
immediate halt to the repression. So far, their protests seem to
have fallen on deaf ears.
When it comes to matters involving human rights, there
are few things that the international community can agree on; that
Burma/Myanmar is a pariah state with a deplorable rights record
happens to be one of them. Indeed, in international fora, such as
the UN General Assembly and UN Human Rights Commission/Council, the
military government has consistently been centred out for its
abusive practices, and with good reason: basic political and civil
rights are under constant and systematic assault; members of the
National League for Democracy (NLD), including the party’s leader
Aung San Suu Kyi, are routinely arrested for political reasons;
torture and ill-treatment in the prisons are commonplace; and,
according to Amnesty International, in recent years hundreds of
thousands of civilians have been displaced from their homes, and
then denied access to assistance from international aid agencies.
Again, these practices have been met by near universal criticism
from the international community.
Sadly, the current crisis in Burma/Myanmar reveals just
how ineffective the practice of shaming governments into improving
their behaviour can be as a strategy for protecting human rights.
For countries that care about their international reputations,
shaming can often be a powerful tool for human rights activists and
other states; but Burma/Myanmar is not one of these countries. In
the past, widespread international condemnation has not had much of
an effect on the military regime. Nor is it likely to have much of
an effect in the immediate future either.
Thankfully, governments and international organizations
are working diligently behind the scenes to broker a resolution to
this latest round of violence. I wish them good luck. They’ll need
it, for they are dealing with a belligerent that has, to date, not
shown the slightest bit of remorse for its actions.
The
opinions expressed are the personal views of the author only, and
do not represent the views of any organization or institution with
which he is affiliated.
2 Comments
Brodie Ross
Very interesting Andrew. I feel the same despair regarding the situation in Burma and the lack of impact that shaming has had. I also question the role of sanctions against this regime. It seems to me that they will only futher isolate the regime and place real change in Burma further from reach. I just made a similar post - would be interested to hear your thoughts. www.igloo.org/brodieblog
Dan O'Hara
Despite all appearances, Gordon Brown's utter outrage and furious saber-rattling, his rallying the world community to the defense ot the Burmese people, seems to be feigned. After all, there's one thing that they could do;
http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.1724312.0.0.php
http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.1724311.0.0.php
Stop selling them, or helping them to buy, weapons?