AIDS is a big deal these days. Lots of thought is going into
how to reverse this disease, which is increasingly understood as an
obstacle to socio-economic development in Africa. New light is
also emerging on the extent to which the disease exists in India
and rural China as well.
All this is fine and well, but I still must say I was
pleasantly surprised to read
this
article about the World Bank getting involved in the fight
against AIDS. Seems like this great organisation has heeded the
world's complaints about its sterile theoretical economic outlook
on the world, and is finally finding a new identity as, yes, a
lending organization, but with a holistic approach.
I was all the more pleased to find this article, and the
great
global health policy
blog that led me to it, after a conversation I had this morning
with a classmate. We were having a few pints with our fellow
Hertians (that's what I've come to calling students of the Hertie
School of Governance) following our end-of-semester applied
economics exam (now you know why I haven't written much this
week).
Anyway, he was telling me about his undergraduate studies in
development, and how everybody in that field would think he was mad
if he ever told them about his dream to work for the World Bank.
According to this friend of mine -- and it certainly doesn't
surprise me -- development studies people are rather fond of
WB-bashing. Although he shared many of their outlooks on the
world, he wanted to work for the monolithic organization that was
their supposed antithesis.
Anyhow, the moral of his story was that it is exactly people
like him, this colleague of mine, that the World Bank and other
dinausaurial governance apparatuses
need if they are to develop
the approaches to the issues of our generation call for. "The
machine is there, you just have to polish it from the inside to
make it do what you think -- what you
know it should be doing."
Seems like the World Bank is a couple years ahead of my
colleague. The more I learn about the many areas to which public
policy is applicable though, the more I am convinced that the shift
from government to governance demarcate a timely maturation in the
way public policy is being done around the world -- and the more I
become an optimist.
0 Comments