This is a guest post by Varun Khandelwal:
India may introduce the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in
2009. LLPs function exactly like partnerships except that the
liability of the partners in an LLP is limited to the contribution
of the partner. A discussion on the LLP bill can be found
here and the actual bill
can be found on the
Ministry of Company Affairs'
Wesite.
What I find very interseting is the implications the LLP bill
will have for the portfolio management/hedge fund industry.
Currently, portfolio managers in India are regulated by SEBI and
face numerous restrictions/regulations on their strategies and
operations. Some regulations are resonable and protect the
investors while some are completely bizzare (take for example the
regulation touting a ban on pooled accounts).
The question is - will SEBI object outright to the use of
LLPs as a vehicle to pool and channel private investments? If not,
then the LLP opens a whole new world of opportunities for HNI
investors and hedge fund managers interested in leverage, shorting
the market, convertible arbitrage, long-short strategiesand other
unconventional investment strategies.
Presently, the only way an investor can gain access to
strategies other than buy-and-hold are through research analysts at
brokerage houses. However, there is an obvious conflict of interst
present there which is removed in the case of an asset manager
who's revenue depends on client profits (and not on portfolio
churning).
LLPs will allow asset managers to start offering
sophisticated portfolio strategies to individuals/corportates/institutions who desire them while limiting liability from
losses and from SEBIs interference. This will benefit the
investment profession as well as investors.
SEBI's role should be similar to the Financial Services
Authority, UK, or the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), USA,
which prohibit hedge funds from marketing their services to the
general public. SEBI spread awareness to investors of the risks
and that hedge funds running as LLPs are not restricted in their
investment practices by SEBI. Invetors who want to take the
additional risk should be allowed to take it.
0 Comments