Skip to main content
G20 leaders from around the world will be meeting in
Washington DC to discuss what many think will be a new era and will
restructure the way the financial system will be doing business as
opposed to the way it has been operating since the 1940s. There is
a general feeling that instruments put in place back then are all
out-dated and as a result hindering the IMF from actually playing
the watchdog role many governments will want to see it do.
Another pressing issue that will most probably future on the
Agenda is the funding of the IMF, which as I mentioned in my last
posting, is highly in need of new funders. Given the fact that
countries like Russia, Saudi Arabia andChina, are members of the G20, there is a wide believe that
these countries will want more saying if the fund will seek to tap
into their vast reserves. So the burning question is ho much will
they request?
Without any doubts, and given the complex nature of the world
financial system, there is a great need for reforms within the IMF.
It has been a principal organ for prescribing reforms to many
countries, through its structural adjustment programs, but now the
IMF needs some drastic reforms, if it needs to maintain its role as
the world major financial institution.
While the current crisis have caused great havoc to the
entire financial system and even crippled some countries, some find
it as a great opportunity to bring in real change. For example, the
BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China ) are calling for reform
of the institution to give more influence to developing economies.
The EU, under the auspices of the French President Mr,
Sarkozy is pushing hard for fundamental reforms within the IMF, but
the extent of such reforms will remain his privacy until next.
Whether he will support the need to give developing countries a
more significant role within the IMF is still to be seen. However,
the EU has come out clear on the need for more supervision of all
financial institutions including hedge funds.
AsTim King, Simon Taylor and
Jennifer Rankinsuggest in their article, the G20 2008 summit in
Washington next week should be a historic summit. One thing remains clear; the summit has been
triggered by the current global financial crunch and hence must be
tackled through a multinational approach. To quote theBrazilian president Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva;"This is a global crisis and it demands global
solutions."
2 Comments
Junchen Feng
As a Chinese, I am looking forward to fundmental change in the IMF governance structure before cooperation and coordiantion.
After all, IMF still runs on the foundation laid on in accordance with the 1944 economic order.
Eric M. Acha
Hi Junchen,
you are right, and we all were looking forward to some dramatic changes in the way the IMF will move on with business. As it turned out, and highly anticipated, a new organ or call college was created, which will monitor and regulate the financial activities of all the G20 members.
But interesting, when the issue on the IMF running out of steam some time in the near future was brought up, China to the dismay of many, played a passive role, allowing Japan to move first and announcing a stunning $100 billion credit package for the fund and hence continue to be perceived as Asia’s premier power.
They did however agree on the need to reform the Bretton Woods Institutions so that emerging and developing economies have greater voice and representation. But still this was a perfect opportunity for China to sieze and capitalise on it by providing the highly needed funds for the IMF and hence Psychologically indebting the institution.