Currently, ~1% of all trips in the US are by bicycle –
much lower than the 10-30% throughout most of Denmark and The
Netherlands. This mode of transportation still requires some steel,
aluminum or other metals during production, but utilizes a
renewable fuel source (human energy derived from food) and is much
more efficient than our reliance on 2,000+ pound vehicles to get us
from place to place on an everyday basis. With pump prices per
gallon approaching $4 for gasoline and $4.50 for diesel, there is
talk of increased bicycling to save money.
The US Bureau of Transportation Statistics
reports that 68% of commuters travel less than 15 miles each
way, seemingly providing a large pool of commuters who travel
distances that are bikeable for an average American. Assuming the
additional cycling share comes from average trips that are 1/3 the
distance of average commutes, a cycling share of 5-10% would lower
US oil consumption by 1-2% (200,000-425,000 barrels per day less
than before). While such savings would not erase our demand for
foreign oil which currently runs ~10 million barrels per day, it
does lower demand enough to make up for the annual decline of
production in our key importer Mexico for the next two years. Many
other demand reduction strategies mentioned in previous blogs can
be employed to make up for further declines. How can we make such a
transition?
Step One: People need access to bicycles.
Well, we may already have enough bicycles to make it happen.
We buy about as many bicycles as cars every year, at over
15 million.
But we often consider them only recreational vehicles such as
mountain bikes for use once we’ve driven to a nice trail in
our car and/or we let them rust unused in our garages. And if
someone doesn’t own a bike yet they can find one for less
than $400 new -- or even less used -- purchase a helmet and lights,
and get on their way. In urban areas such as DC and San Francisco,
folks won’t even have to own them as bicycle share programs
that people can borrow for short trips for just $40 per year. So,
we can check that obstacle off the list.
Step Two: People need safe routes from their homes to their
places of work, school, errands and play.
This is the kicker. While some bike lane corridors exist and
other bicyclists are courageous enough to ride with automobile
traffic, convenient and comfortable bike-friendly infrastructure is
woefully lacking in most communities. Investments into
infrastructure are never cheap, but are dramatically less expensive
per mile than building new roads or train lines. Sometimes new bike
lanes can be as easy as extending the shoulder a couple feet,
painting new lines, and posting a few signs to remind motorists to
share the road. As long as we build key arteries for bicyclists to
get in and out of town/city centers, they can often navigate the
smaller neighborhood roads to get to the bicycle corridors.
As has been stressed before, bicycling is no silver bullet
– but it can help make significant progress along with our
other efforts toward further carpooling, transit and telecommuting
advances.
0 Comments