The emerging global food crisis has brought crop production
back into our consciousness. I myself have started to follow the
record prices of corn, soybeans, rice and other foods sold
worldwide in the commodities market. The trends of the last several
months brings Malthusian chills to observers of the price hikes
among physical commodities that have constraints on supply while
rising populations and incomes increase demand. The movie
“King Corn”
released early this year was made in 2005/2006 and thus describes
the corn market before the ethanol boom had its significant impact
on price. This historical perspective shows how such dramatic
global consequences of food cost inflation went unanticipated by so
many for so long.
For the past three decades, corn farmers have generally been
producing more than consumers demand. Many farmers were operating
at a loss and required government support to make ends meet. Huge
surpluses filled the silos across Iowa and the Great Plains. Corn
was so abundant that it fed both humans and livestock – and
it even became the primary sweetener for sodas and candies above
beet and cane sugar. The production of ethanol to substitute oil
became a win-win proposition by providing a market for some of the
unused corn while also reducing foreign demand for oil. But it
appears the federal planners who
established a mandate in 2005 of 7.5 billion gallons produced
by 2012 and last year’s expansion to 15 billion gallons by
2022 forgot their calculators to extrapolate the effects of such
increases in ethanol production. While some ethanol production can
help farmers maintain profitable bushel prices for their corn and
provide a regional fuel, the size of unfolding mandates appear
poised to wreak havoc on our global food system.
In 2008,
over 30% of the harvest is expected to go to ethanol
production. Further increases in ethanol production (to replace up
to 10% of US gasoline demand) would send corn prices to even higher
than the $6 per bushel all-time record reached earlier this year.
With corn in almost everything that we eat, as the documentary
demonstrates, such a price trajectory would pressure inflation
throughout our food supply. The more corn we produce for ethanol,
the less land we have to cultivate soybeans and other crops –
which puts pressure on people around the Amazon and other tropical
rainforests to destroy the native wildlife and replace it with
monoculture farmland.
I recommend relaxing the mandate going forward and saving
federal dollars by reducing the 51-cent per gallon subsidy for
corn-based ethanol. Such policy could help to get global food
systems back in balance and could even help to preserve
biodiversity and the climate saving nature of our world’s
tropical rainforests.
0 Comments