Skip to main content

The World and I

Asti's musings on the (non)functioning world

Peace in Kenya - But who won?

 I was as happy as everyone else when I heard that through the combine efforts of mediators, such as Kofi Annan and Oluyemi Adeniji, Mr. Kibaki and Mr. Odinga reached a " power sharing" deal, ending months of violence in Kenya.

Kenya was one of Africa's "poster boys" when it came to peace stability and growth. It was able to accommodate booming tourist industry in part due to these features and acted as the stable force in what is sometimes a very unstable region. Until the 27th of December, that is - when the all to familiar election picture in Sub-Saharan Africa once again took its course: allegations of election rigging, incumbent not willing to hand down power and finally culminating in violence. In Kenya? Yes in Kenya!

With the new deal reached months after the completion of elections, we seem to thankfully have seen the end of violence in Kenya. The  National Accord and Reconciliation Act will see Mr. Kibaki retain his presidecy and Mr. Odinga will become prime minister (through a constitutional change that will create this new post), and this should ensure that both parties will share power.

But one main thing seems to have been forgotten: who actually won the election? Or is this not important anymore?
Post Comment

1 Comment

Brandon Currie

So long as Kenya gets back on track - meaning ethnic toleration and steady economic growth - then no, I don't think the election result is all that important anymore. The crisis that gripped the country is about much more than the disputed vote, so if both sides (and their supporters) feel justice has been done and are willing to move foward, that's just about the best ending anyone could hope for.

To comment you must be a registered user.